Random Colloquialism
Originally posting1, here are some thoughts from reading this article2, on random variables on how they are not. The author addresses this quote , “Why random variables are neither random nor variables” Summarizing, the author would prefer I think “random variables” were renamed as “probabilistically deterministic functions”. or maybe more verbosely, “probabilistically deterministic functions mapping uncertainty to known possible outcomes”. The argument being, that, “random variables” are not variables because they are not single numbers but really intended to describe how a probabilistic distribution , say, maps to outcomes. I like that the author refers to these outcomes as “shadow numbers” 🙂. (And by extension I like the point that, just semantically, a number, “14” , is not random even if it was generated through a quantum event, because by definition the mapping function is what is random and not the numbers they produce). ...
